Judy McLaughlin-Ryan MFT

Judy McLaughlin-Ryan MFT

Treatment of Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder with Addictions, Utilizing a Twelve-Step Program as an Adjunctive to Psychotherapy

FOR PURPOSES OF PRIVACY THE INDIVIDUAL CASE STUDY HAS BEEN REMOVED, IT WILL ONLY BE USED FOR TEACHING PURPOSES

Taken from ECOTS2007 presentation June 2007

by Judy McLaughlin-Ryan from USA 310-209-0740 

Research suggests that, when treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which is at the core of symptomatology of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) and co-morbid addictions, participation in a twelve-step program early in the treatment process decreases the likelihood of relapse. Quimette, Moos, and Finney (2003) found that patients with substance use disorders and PTSD who received focused treatment for PTSD immediately following treatment for the substance use disorder, along with participation in a twelve-step program during the first year of treatment, were more likely to experience long-term (five-year) remission from the substance use disorder.

Because research reflects significant co-morbidity rates between PTSD and addictions, the parallel treatment of both conditions is key to resolving the disorders. Donovan, Padin-Rivera, and Kowaliw (2001) estimated the rate of substance abuse among persons with PTSD to be as high as 60-80%. Jacobson, Southwick, and Kosten (2001) studied the pathophysiology of PTSD and substance abuse, finding that both are functionally related to one another, with high rates of comorbidity.

Research also suggests that, with PTSD, positive group support is the strongest predictive factor significantly related to a decrease in the severity of the PTSD symptoms (Guay, Billette, & Marchand, 2006). The constellation of similarities between CPTSD and addictions (CPTSD/A), supported by research findings, points to the necessity of integrating social support into the treatment. The twelve-step model, as an adjunctive, offers reparative experiences in the areas of regulation, attachment, brain functioning and altruistic service to others.

As an adjunctive to psychotherapy, the utilization of a twelve-step program provides individual and group support for the patient. The twelve-step group provides remedial experiences for the patient that increase the likelihood of ameliorating the symptoms of both disorders. Although utilizing a twelve-step program as an adjunctive to the treatment is not a panacea, and is not appropriate for all patients, participation in the twelve-step program increases the likelihood of addressing the following confounding issues of treatment with this population: maintaining abstinence from drugs/ alcohol or other addictive behaviors, while simultaneously treating PTSD, and increasing the patient’s tolerance for secure attachments, tolerance for social support, mindfulness regarding the integrated interoceptive experiences of body and mind, and opportunities for interactive assistance with regulatory responses that mobilize activation responses that result in a safe place to which the patient can turn. Van der Kolk’s (2006) research suggests that this mobilization, based on awareness, is vital for those with complex trauma and/or PTSD. Overall, the twelve-step model is an action-oriented program that offers a “safe place to go or run to” when in distress.

Symptoms of PTSD are at the core of CPTSD/A; therefore, research findings for PTSD and complex trauma overlap. CPTSD includes diagnostic PTSD symptoms, as well as problems with attachment, cognition, and self-concept. Additionally, CPTSD and addictions have many symptoms in common, especially in the areas of dysregulation and attachment. With CPTSD, not only are the classic PTSD symptoms of dysregulation of affect and state present, but also the patient typically suffers from prolonged interpersonal trauma and abuse, which results in the loss of a sense of trust, safety, self-worth, coherency, and one’s systems of meaning (Cook, Blaustein, Spinazzola, & van der Kolk, 2003). Patients with CPTSD also have disturbances in the areas of attachment, resulting in distrust, loss of faith, searching for a rescuer, social isolation, difficulty attuning to other people’s emotional states and views, disturbances on neurobiological development effecting physiologic and neuroendocrinologic responses as well as maturation of specific brain structures, hypersensitivity to physical contact, analgesia, somatization, numerous medical problems, depersonalization and derealization, poor modulation of impulses, aggressive behavior, substance abuse, eating disorders, learning difficulties, language development problems, a general sense of being ineffective in dealing with one’s own environment, believing that one is permanently damaged, difficulty describing feelings, a sense of emptiness, feelings of dread, suicidal ideation, and an inability to read internal states (Cook et al., 2003, van der Kolk, 2006; van der Kolk, Pelcovitz, Mandel, McFarlane, & Herman, 1996).

I am suggesting that treating both disorders on a parallel track, while utilizing the twelve-step social context to strengthen and develop the patient’s interpersonal relationships, is key to successful treatment. Both disorders, dysregulating in origin and causing significant disturbances in overall functioning, need to be treated simultaneously, with overarching social support. If the patient builds interactive, attuned social relationships that address difficulties with dysregulated emotional responses, the patient will have longer term, readily available options when in distress.

PTSD (Semple et al.,1992) and alcoholism (Adams et al., 1995) both show evidence of structural impairments in orbitofrontal activity. Schore’s (2003) work suggests that “these functional vulnerabilities reflect structural weaknesses and defects in the organization of the orbitofrontal cortex, the neurobiological regulatory structure that is centrally involved in the adjustment or correction of emotional responses” (p. 24).

When treating the CPTSD/A population, if one condition is treated, while the other is ignored, the treatment often becomes chronically sabotaged. If patients seek regulatory mediation utilizing drug abuse or alcohol, a cascade of relapse events occur, interfering with the potential for self-regulatory functioning. Additionally, these relapses usually disrupt the development of potentially secure attachments. If the addiction is treated, while ignoring or dismissing the CPTSD, triggering events can lead to the fight, flight, or freeze response. After a triggering event, the patient may respond by isolating him or herself, becoming aggressive, or dissociating, to name a few responses. Again, this response may disrupt the potential for self-regulatory functioning, as well as the development of potentially secure attachments. However, if the patient has access to a broader socially supportive community of attuned others, such as a twelve-step program, during these times of distress, he or she has options for potentially reparative experiences in the areas of both regulation and attachment.

Research abounds linking symptoms of dysregulation with disorganized attachment patterns (Main & Solomon, 1986, 1990), especially with CPTSD and addictions. This research has expanded our understanding of the attachment patterns of secure, insecure-avoidant, and insecure-resistant (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978). Bowlby (1973) looked at the link between attachment processes and dissociative psychopathology. He referred to internal working models (IWM), which are formulated as a result of care-seeking interactions with primary caregivers. The formation of multiple IWMs serves to regulate emotions and cognitions in a way that is alien to the self (Bowlby, 1973). He further described patient’s symptoms as the outcome of attachment figures that induced the child to disown personal, firsthand experiences (Bowlby, 1978, 1979).

In more recent literature, this observation of Bowlby’s is now referred to as dissociation and disorganizing attachment patterns. Grotstein (1986) recognized that early-forming psychopathology results in disorders of attachment that manifest in neurobiological impairments and result in failures of self and/or interaction regulation. Schore (2003) asserts that “the functional indicators of this adaptive limitation are specifically manifest in recovery deficits of internal reparative mechanisms” (p. 24). As a result, there are deficits in coping with negative affect and deficits in adaptive responses to socioemotional stress. Van der Kolk and Fisler (1994) recognize this inability to regulate intense feelings as the most far-reaching effect of early trauma. The two can barely be separated, as it is currently understood that both regulation responses and attachment patterns can either complement one another in treatment or implicate one another.

I believe that, along with the formation of a therapeutically developed secure attachment, which assists with regulatory responses for the patient, the twelve-step experience may offer an additional socially-driven support system, in which exposure to secure attachments and self and other interactive regulatory experiences can be developed. Liotti’s ( 2006) theory suggests the need in psychotherapy for a phase-oriented process focused primarily on achieving attachment security and, secondarily, on the trauma work. Along with others, I am suggesting that achieving a secure therapeutic relationship, as well as developing other significant interpersonal relationships in treatment, is of primary importance (Gold et al., 2001). Further, the exposure to potentially long-term interactive experiences with members of their twelve-step group can provide remarkable reparative experiences. For example, an Alcoholic Anonymous (A.A.) survey taken in 2004 found that 36% of the members were sober over a ten-year period, 70% had a sponsor (a person who shares their experiences and provides strength) within 90 days of attending their first meeting, and meeting attendance averaged over two meetings per week. Additionally, 8% of the members indicated that they were referred to A.A. by a healthcare professional, 31% were referred through a treatment facility (Alcoholics Anonymous, 2004).

The twelve-step model, although primarily for the treatment of the addictive disorder, offers regulating and mediating reparative experiences that address CPTSD as well. Not only does the twelve-step program assist the patient in mediating experiences, but it also assists in developing and modeling secure attachments that not only help the patient, but help others at the same time. This altruistic basic tenet of the twelve-step program, helping others, is grounded in an action-oriented approach, accomplished through interactive, action-oriented directives between members.

When members in the twelve-step program are in distress, they are encouraged by other members to reach out for help. Whether the member is in a CPTSD-triggered response or an addiction triggered response, he or she has the option to interact with others in order to mediate painful affective/state experiences, using the tools of the twelve-step program. The members are encouraged by other members, and the program’s literature, to share their distress with each other in order to help themselves, as well as each other. Members are encouraged to reach out and share with others through going to group meetings, making service commitments at the group meetings, making telephone calls to other suffering members, actively helping others in distress, having a relationship with a sponsor, doing writing assignments, and learning about and working the twelve steps, twelve traditions, and twelve concepts (Appendix). Overall, in the twelve-step program, the act of sharing each other’s experiences, strength, and hope is what unifies the members. Helping one another is the primary tenet and is believed to be paramount to recovery (Alcoholics Anonymous, 2005).

Many clinicians working with CPTSD/A have firsthand clinical experience of just how difficult taking action can be for this CPTSD/A population. When patients experience dysregulating symptoms, sometimes another person must literally be present to activate the patients’ initiating responses. If a patient has a flashback, is dissociated or immobilized in the freeze response, in a reactive fight response, or obsessed with using alcohol or drugs, proactive behavior may be improbable and/or neurobiologically impossible without an interaction with another. Patients with CPTSD/A are frequently unable to read their bodily cues or alarms, and when misread, may take life extinguishing actions in response to an internal cue, when, in fact, the cue was telling the patient to reach out for help, receive comfort from another, or something about his or her bodily needs.

Interoception, defined by Cameron (2001), is the psychosomatic process of the brain’s influence on bodily functions and afferent sensory input to the central nervous system. It affects behavior, cognitive function and emotions. It is the mechanism of visceral sensory psychobiology, including internal organs in the abdominal cavity, and affects the viscera, resulting in an intuitive experience. As seen above, interoception is short circuited in patients with CPTSD/A. The basic tenet of interoception is that it is the interchange between the body and the brain. As Cameron states: Bodily changes follow directly the perception of the exciting fact, and that our feeling of the same changes as they occur IS the emotion . . . Without the bodily states following on the perception, the latter would be purely cognitive in form, pale, colorless, destitute of emotional warmth. We might then see the bear, and judge it best to run, receive the insult and deem it right to strike, but we should not actually feel afraid or angry. (p. 698)

With those who have CPTSD/A, emotions are often not read at all, reacted upon appropriately, or often not utilized for life supportive, action-oriented behavior out of the context of a traumatic interpretation.

Van der Kolk (2006) discussed the necessity for the patient with PTSD to learn how to take effective action. For example, after one is stressed, the reaction to run towards a loved one for comfort and safety is a predictable response. With those who suffer from PTSD, this mobilization response may be impossible. Because many with PTSD experience chronically overwhelming emotions, they often lose their capacity to use emotions as guides for effective action. “Unable to gauge and modulate their own internal states, they habitually collapse in the face of threat or lash out in response to minor irritations. Futility becomes the hallmark of daily life” (p. 282). He described the necessity in treatment to address and pay sufficient attention to “the experience and interpretation of disturbed physical sensations and preprogrammed physical action patterns (p. 282). In other words, before one can take an effective action, one must have a sense of what is going on inside of his or her body and develop the capacity to act upon these sensations appropriately and not only from the perspective of the traumatic response. This awareness is a precursor to subsequent life supportive, action-oriented responses.

Those with CPTSD/A may not be aware of typical affective and state bodily functions such as hunger, tiredness, physical illness, loneliness, and many others. This awareness is a precursor to life supportive action taking. Many patients with PTSD are overwhelmed by focusing on internal sensations and deny having an inner sense of themselves. Self-awareness may initially result in a retraumatizing experience (van der Kolk, 2006). The patient may leave the here and now in response to the self-awareness and interpret the sensation or awareness as the trauma reoccurring once again. This reading of the awareness aborts the proactive response that needs to be taken. Experiences that reorient and refocus the sensory awareness into interpretive proactive experiences are needed for effective action to occur.

Ogden and Minton’s (2000) work in the Sensorimotor Psychotherapy Institute addresses approaches that are focused on physiological elements of trauma that are somatically based. Their work suggests the integration of sensorimotor processing with cognitive emotional processing in the treatment of trauma, with the therapist interactively regulating clients’ dysregulated states as clients build their awareness and understanding of their inner bodily sensations. For this awareness or interoceptive experience to occur, patients need to learn to identify their physical sensations and translate their emotions and experiences into communicable language (van der Kolk, 2006).

Mindfulness heightens the capacity to become filled by the senses of the moment and attuned to our own state of being. As we also become aware of our awareness, we can sharpen our present focus on the present, enabling us to feel our feet as we travel the path of our lives. (Siegel, 2007, pp. 14-15)

Patients’ increasing internal awareness, while learning to understand themselves, metabolizes the activation of the capacity to look for and/or find a safe place to go (van der Kolk, 2006).

Assuming that the development of mindfulness and interoceptive life supportive actions are being developed in the treatment, provisions for a safe place to go are critical. Without a safe place, the patient could experience further reenactment of the original trauma, where one was left unprotected, without any reregulating interactive experience. The point of cultivating this internal understanding in the patient is to assist the patient in the process of engaging, or as Siegel (2007) stated, a process of enhancing compassion and empathy, while experiencing authentic connections with consideration and more reflection.

Providing the patient with a safe harbor and interactive figures that serve as interoceptionists is vital to the treatment of CPTSD, and increasing a community experience should be a part of the treatment goals. The exclusive therapeutic relationship can provide only a piece of the therapeutic puzzle, especially because the therapist cannot be available at all times to all of his or her patients, when they are having a triggered reaction or the compulsion to use drugs or alcohol in a destructive manner as a means to mediate their tension.

Those who have CPTSD, when in a fight, flight, and/or freeze response, in regard to a triggering event, need “a place to go,” “a place to run to,” “a place of hope.” This running towards hope metabolizes a reparative primitive response to the traumatic experience or traumatic memory. The twelve-step program offers that place to go for hope. Meetings are available worldwide, and there are 24-hour phone lines, on-line meetings, and on-line discussion groups. “A.A. can be found almost everywhere almost all the time–in more than 105,000 groups throughout the world” (Alcoholics Anonymous 2005, p. 48). A.A. is a fellowship of men and women who share their experience, strength, and hope with each other so that they may solve their common problem and help others to recover from alcoholism. A.A. is not allied with any sect, denomination, politics, organization, or institution. Our primary purpose is to stay sober and help other alcoholics achieve sobriety” (Anonymous, 1970, p.1).

Members are encouraged to make contact when in distress and not to wait to do so. Many members offer telephone numbers for outreach calls and remind one another that these outreach calls help both parties involved, not simply the person in distress. Most clinicians and psychotherapeutic support groups do not offer this type of broad range availability all hours of the day, seven days a week. Therefore, while the patient is in treatment, developing the security of a place to go when in distress any time of day offers the potential for the patient to build secure attachments, learn to self-regulate, and learn to help others, which subsequently develops the potential for the patient to have the experience of compassion and attunement through identification.

A confounding treatment problem with CPTSD/A is that the dysregulatory response of flight, fight, or freeze, with added emotionally reactive responses of compulsivity and obsession, may disrupt the patient’s capacity to automatically and autonomously initiate life supportive, healthy action responses to distress. One cannot assume that the patient has had sufficient interactive attuned experiences to be independently aware of his or her own dysregulated state. Sometimes, the patient may require another’s input to make a down or up regulating response. In other words, for the patient experiencing massive dysregulatory responses, including the compulsive need for addictive behavior to mediate the stress, the execution of a plan of positive action may sometimes not be simple or even possible.

Most clinicians who have had experience working with those who have a traumatically-driven addictive responses understand how therapeutic interventions and cognitive-intellectual understanding can be massively limited for the patient when it comes to actually putting these life supportive responses into action. Because reflective thought is incompatible with the traumatic reaction, sometimes an attuned interactive experience is necessary at the time of the traumatic reaction. Again, the therapist and/or family members may not be available during these perturbations of symptomatology. However, if the patient is developing a community of others in the twelve-step program, instructions on socially-driven action-oriented responses are more likely to be developed via the attuned interactive experiences and the availability of a safe place.

The experience of having access to another member of the program and the development of an internalized working model of a social community that models awareness of self, secure attachment bonds to mitigate states of dysregulation, the reliance on others, identifying the cause of the problem, and then taking the appropriate action to solve that problem helps the patient become aware of his or her own internal states. This development occurs through the reliance on others by seeking identifying experiences with fellow members and through faith in some power greater than oneself. Schore (2003) discusses how a regulating attachment of another not only helps regulate the dysregulated patient, but literally develops a more regulated neurobiological brain and thus a more regulated reaction. In other words, during times of this type of distress, interaction is vital. The twelve-step program members practice sharing how the program has worked in their lives, which generally involves self-regulating experiences. Members share how they found solutions to distress and/or their dysregulating experiences.

The CPTSD/A condition can interfere with some of the most basic areas of life supportive daily actions and daily functioning, such as eating, sleeping, and mood, as well as other states and affective experiences. Van der Kolk (2006) describes the basic problems that those with PTSD have with interoceptive experiences. He suggests that the therapist’s functions include being an interoceptionist or one who facilitates the patient’s learning to tolerate, understand, and finally react to internal feelings and sensations. Van der kolk (2006) describes the difficulties that traumatized individuals have focusing on internal sensations. When traumatized individuals try to mediate these trauma-related perceptions, emotions, and sensations, they often deny the bodily experience or feel overwhelmed by it. Thus, taking any action as a result of a bodily sensation is impossible.

As noted above, traumatic experiences often have an impact on the patient’s interpretation of bodily states and affects, including awareness of his or her own body in relationship to others.

Case study deleted for privacy purposes, used for teaching only. Some of case study included without privacy disclosed. (see the following)

HALT is one example of how the twelve-step program addresses problems with interactive experiences of mindfulness regarding interoception and basic bodily physical functions, develops secure and attuned attachments, and helps regulate terrifying affective/state experiences. Jack’s directed reading was taken from Courage to Be Me (Alanon World Service Literature, 1996 ). “We can watch for the need to HALT and give ourselves special attention when we are feeling Hungry or Angry or Lonely or Tired” (p. 139). His sponsor shared with Jack how this concept of HALT was applied to his own life, and he shared his experiences. His sponsor explained that the daily readings are from A.A.’s World Service Conference approved literature (governing body through group conscious decision making) and provides a daily guide to concepts of recovery. It was recommended that he read “Hope for Today,” a daily reflection book for Al-Anon Family Groups, providing hope for families and friends of alcoholics. On April 5, it states:
HALT. Don’t get too hungry, angry, lonely, or tired. I use this reminder to help me set healthy limits for myself, which I never learned as a child of an alcoholic. In the past, I often believed I should be able to go for days without food or sleep. I also tested the limits of my ability to handle enormous doses of stress and isolation without tending to my own emotional needs.

Al-Anon has taught me a gentler, simpler way of caring for myself. I find it of great benefit to have a brief list of the most basic areas in which I neglect my own well-being: nourishment, emotional wellness, fellowship, and physical rest. First, is my stomach rumbling? Then I need to stop what I am doing and eat some food. Am I too angry about the trivial details of my life? If so I can take a break and punch a pillow or engage in some physical exercise. Am I lonely? I could go to a meeting or call my sponsor. Finally, am I so tired that I can’t keep my eyes open? Then it’s time to lie down for a nap or a good night’s sleep.

Thought for the Day:
When I feel stressed, I’ll stop to check whether my basic needs are being met (Anonymous, 2002, p. 96).
(The book also is available in French, German, Japanese, and Spanish.)

When Jack met his sponsor that evening at the coffee shop, as the sponsor drank his herbal tea, Jack read his writing on the first three steps of A.A. to him. He wrote out each step and then they discussed his thoughts, feelings, and behavior. The first step is “We admitted we were powerless over alcohol, that our life had become unmanageable.” The second step is “Came to believe a power greater than myself could restore me to sanity.” The third step is “Became willing to turn my will and my life over to the care of God as I understand God, praying only for his will for me and the power to carry that out” (Anonymous, 2001, p. 59).

Although Jack had no belief in God, he and his sponsor agreed that Jack would use his love for animals as his belief system, in order to find a sense of faith, peace, and hope. Jack felt that he was always able to rely on the animal world and it became an internalized working model for Jack. When Jack discussed the unmanageability of his mood and behavior with his sponsor, he was able to turn to his belief in the animal kingdom as a source of comfort. When he felt this sense of comfort from images of animals whom he loved, he felt his sane behavior and regulated mood return.

Subsequently, Jack and his sponsor had many such meetings together. Instead of drinking alcohol, Jack experienced an interactive relationship with an empathic other, a secure attachment, had the immediacy of a place to go for hope, and most importantly learned about tools of self -regulation.

Jack built his sense of safety with his twelve-step meetings. Jack came to believe that the meetings he attended and the relationships he was establishing with others in his meetings were also a form of God for him. Working his third step, he was reassured.

The “Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions” states, in reference to the concept of God, “Surely he must now depend upon Somebody or Something else. At first that “somebody” is likely to be a close A.A. friend.

Jack came to rely on the assurance that his troubles, now made more acute because he could not use alcohol to kill the pain, could be solved. Of course, the sponsor pointed out that, even though he is sober, his life is still unmanageable, that he has just made a start through A.A. More sobriety brought about by the admission of alcoholism and by attendance at a few meetings is very good, but it is a far cry from permanent sobriety and a contented, useful life. This is where the remaining steps of the A.A. program come in. Nothing short of continuous action as a way of life can bring the much-desired result (Anonymous, 2001).

The distinction between a religious program and spiritual program was critical for Jack. Had Jack been expected to join a religious organization or an organization with a definitive concept of God, he would not have been able to participate. Although there are religious references throughout the literature of twelve-step programs, the program is not allied with any sect, denomination, organization, institution, or religious organization. Unity serves as the spiritual foundation.

The A.A. member has to conform to the principles of recovery. His life actually depends upon obedience to spiritual principles . . . Moreover, he finds he cannot keep this priceless gift unless he gives it away . . . The moment this Twelfth Step work forms a group, another discovery is made–that most individuals cannot recover unless there is a group . . . He learns that the clamor of desires and ambitions within him must be silenced whenever these could damage the group. It becomes plain that the group must survive or the individual will not. (Anonymous, 2001, p. 130)

The understanding was that Jack was now responsible to learn how to take action to help others, which he found terrifying. Jack worked the subsequent steps of his program and became less and less isolated through the process. After he had approximately seven months of continuous sobriety, he was asked to speak at at a weekly men’s stag meeting. He and his sponsor discussed what Jack felt comfortable disclosing. His responsibility was to think about how he identified with others suffering from similar issues. If speaking felt retraumatizing to Jack, he was directed to wait and help others in another way, such as cleaning coffee cups or being a greeter at a meeting.

While discussing in session the possibility of sharing at his meeting, he broke out in a sweat. He was sweating so profusely that I could see the sweat in the front of his neatly ironed shirt. He was given a cold pack to help him regulate down. We discussed his state and his affect and how it was linked to the past, not to his group.

As Jack was increasingly able to reflect on his terror, past experience, and affective/state reactions during the session, his memories increased. He recalled making efforts to communicate with his father, to identify with his father through play patterns, and how his father would brutalize him. His fear recurred when asked to share at his men’s group. Although Jack had been meeting with his men’s group for months, was never criticized or harshly judged, and was reassured that his participation and physical presence at the meeting were highly valued, he was sure that the group would hurt him. Jack knew that he was not required to speak at his group meeting. Jack was reassured by his sponser that the sole purpose of speaking at meetings is to help another suffering addict or alcoholic. Speaking is a service to other members and especially to those who are new.

Should Jack decide to speak, his sponsor reiterated, he would only need to tell his story in a general way, and how the program has worked for him. Although Jack continued to feel fear about speaking at the meeting, he felt more strongly compelled to overcome his fear and take the action of speaking at the meeting which would possibly help others. In session, Jack realized that most of his fear was historical and related to his father’s abuse.

Jack decided that he would speak at his meeting. He decided to discuss his terror experiences and how, before he was sober, these feelings of terror were quickly followed by alcohol abuse. He discussed how early memories were riddled with terror, pain, isolation, death wishes, being numb, and then attempting to drown any and all feelings. He discussed how his early experiences with the twelve-step program taught him how to reach out for help, when he was unable to help himself. He remembered how terrified he was when his group invited him for fellowship after a meeting and how courageous he felt after he participated in fellowship, rather than going home to his apartment and isolating himself. Jack felt better about the possibility of speaking at his group.

Many of Jack’s subsequent sessions addressed the sensation Jack got when he spoke. After moderately sweating through his shirt while speaking, many of his fellow members shared how they also sweat when they share. The discussions in session were focused on topics such as terror of intimacy and how important the development of intimacy skills are in recovery. His friends reassured him that taking action, reaching out, and mostly helping others would be paramount to his recovery process. After he spoke, many of Jack’s friends gave him feedback, and at the end of his speaking a man with one day of sobriety, who had a similar history to Jack’s, asked him to be his sponsor.

Jack finished his steps four through ten, which require introspection, writing, sharing with others and the capacity to go within and search one’s concept of self, beliefs, behaviors, and personality characteristics. The steps gave Jack an opportunity to look within. Each time he had a bodily experience, an affective/state experience, his program friends would reference him back to his understandings about himself. All along the way, he was emotionally supported by other people in the program and encouraged to take action when necessary. The level of interaction Jack experienced was foreign to him, and one could consistently observe changes with Jack in session. Jack was able to look at me in session for brief periods of time, as he was told by his sponsor that he had nothing to be ashamed of or fear. He was told this frequently by the men in the program who had frequent contact with Jack. Over time, Jack’s need to avert his gaze diminished. He stopped feeling as though he would be brutalized if he looked at someone.

When Jack discussed his interactions with others, he observed his emotional responses to others. He had an incident with a woman at a meeting in which he told a joke, but then became angry when she did not think it was funny. He started to obsess about gaining her approval, and this also became a trigger point due to his focus on gaining his mother’s approval in childhood. Jack walked away from her in a huff. He subsequently went home from the meeting and decided to isolate himself from others. He did not go to his meeting the following day because he was angry that this women did not laugh at his joke. He thought that perhaps his absences would be a form of revenge on her. He fantasized that she would notice him missing from the meeting and worry about him.

When Jack finally called his sponsor and told his sponsor about the interaction he had with the woman, his sponsor told Jack to make an amends to the woman in his group and look at why he became so reactive. Jack was directed to work the tenth step with his sponsor by reading page 91 and then writing about it. He would later read his writing to his sponsor.

Step ten states:
A spot-check inventory taken in the midst of such disturbances can be of very great help in quieting stormy emotions. Today’s spot check finds its chief application to situations which arise in each day’s march . . . he quick inventory is aimed at our daily ups and down, especially those where people or new events throw us off balance and tempt us to make mistakes . . . In all of these situations we need self-restraint, honest analysis of what is involved, a willingness to admit when the fault is ours, and an equal willingness to forgive when the fault is elsewhere . . . We shall look for progress not perfection . . . Nothing pays off like restraint of tongue and pen. We must avoid quick-tempered criticism and furious, power-driven argument. The same goes for sulking or silent scorn . . . For we can neither think nor act to good purpose until the habit of self-restraint has become automatic. (p. 91)

Jack increased his capacity to reflect, and feel concern for others, instead of taking his anger out on himself unnecessarily, and/or others as his parents did. He came to his meeting and apologized to the woman. When she told him that she had lost a beloved animal that day, he gave her a hug. Jack had an experience of caring for another. His reparative experience became a critical turning point for Jack, and he was developing the capacity to truly interact in a somewhat attuned manner. Jack saw me in session, unlike he had ever seen me before. He said that he had not really noticed my being there, in a way that I was human. Jack asked how I was. He was practicing.

During Jack’s second year of treatment, we discussed the possibility of him traveling. Although he had told his parents that he was hoping to begin to travel, he was afraid. They told him to go get married, that he needed a women, and they wanted him to go to a region of the world where prostitution runs rampant. Jack saw the dysfunction. He said that his stomach turned when his parents suggested it, and he verbally expressed his discomfort to his parents regarding their highly unacceptable recommendation. Jack and I discussed at length his desire to see the world, to travel.

Jack researched a program on the east coast of the United States that offers twelve-step men’s retreats. The program offered a one-week stay in which there were process support groups, twelve-step groups, individual therapy, recreation and, most importantly to Jack, bonding. Jack booked the flight and worked through more of his fear, by taking action.

When Jack returned, he was again, visibly different. He learned that he has a very good sense of humor and made two good friends with whom he planned to stay in contact . His two new friends and he already had made plans to socialize in a few months.

The progress Jack made was due to the parallel track of his therapeutic relationship with me, which addressed his affective/state dysregulation, his attending to his physical sicknesses, the development of his interoceptive experience, his internal processing in response to the need to take action, and his attachment patterns developing into secure versus insecure patterns. Jack slowly bonded with the twelve-step group members and slowly became comfortable with the tenets of his twelve-step program. Jack continued on his medication, which was a critical piece of his progress.

At the end of Jack’s treatment, he was working on his last two steps of the twelve-step program, which included being of service to others and prayer and meditation. His experience at this time was in keeping with therapeutic suggestions that are at the forefront of Siegel’s(2007) profound work on the social brain, prayer, and meditation. Jack, a man who informed me at the onset of treatment that he had no interest in any human being, learned how to be of service to his fellow person, requiring attunement and compassion.

References

Ainsworth, S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978).
Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Adams, K. M., Gilman, S., Koeppe, R., Kluin, K., Junck, L., Lohman, M., Johnson-Greene, D., Berent, S., Dede, D., & Krol, P. (1995). Correlation of neuropsychological function with cerebral metabolic rate in subdivisions of the frontal lobes of older alcoholic patients measured with (18F) flourodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography. Neuropsychology, 9, 275-280.

Alateen members & Sponsers. (1996). Courage to be me: Living with alcoholism.
Virginia: Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, Inc.

Alcoholics Anonymous. (2005). 2004 membership survey. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.

Anonymous. (1970). Alcoholics Anonymous Grapevine: Our meeting in print. New York: the AA Grapevine, Inc.

Anonymous. (2001). Alcoholic Anonymous: The story of how many thousands of men and women have recovered from alcoholism (4th ed.). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.

Anonymous. (2002). Hope for today. Virginia: Al-Anon Family Group Headquarters, Inc.

Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation, anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.

Bowlby, J. (1978). Attachment theory and its therapeutic implications. In S. C. Feinstein & P. L. Giovacchini (Eds.), Adolescent psychiatry: Developmental and clinical studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bowlby, J. (1979). On knowing what you are not supposed to know and feeling what you are not supposed to feel. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 403-408.

Cameron, O. G. (2001). Interoception: The inside story: A model for psychosomatic processes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 697-710.

Cook, A., & Blaustein, M., & Spinazzola, J., & van der Kolk, B. A. (2003). Complex trauma in children and adolescents. White paper, National Child Traumatic Stress Network, Complex Trauma Task Force. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://www.nctsn.org/nccts/nav.do?pid=hom_main

Donovan, B., Padin-Rivera, E., & Kowaliw, S. (2001). “Transcend”: Initial outcomes from a post-traumatic stress disorder substance abuse treatment program. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14(4), 757-772.

Gold, S. N., Elhai, J. D., Rea, B. D., Weiss, D., Masino, T., Morris, S. L., & McInich, J. (2001). Contextual treatment of dissociative identity disorder: Three case studies.Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 2, 5-35.

Grotstein, J. S. (1986). The psychology of powerlessness: Disorders of self-regulation and interactional regulation as a newer paradigm for psychoathology. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 6, 93-118.

Guay, S., Billette, V., & Marchand, A. (2006). Exploring the links between post-traumatic stress disorder and social support: Processes and potential research avenues. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(3), 327-338.

Jacobson, L. K., Southwick, S. M., & Kosten, T. R. (2001). Substance use disorders in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of the literature. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1184-1190.

Liotti, G. (2006). A model of dissociation based on attachment theory and research. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 7(4), 55-74.

Liotti, G., Mollon, P., & Miti, G. (2005). Dissociative disorders. In G. Gabbard, J. Beck & J. Holmes (Eds.), Oxford textbook of psychotherapy (pp. 205-213). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986), Discovery of an insecure-disorganized/disoriented attachment pattern: Procedures, findings and implications for the classification of behavior. In T. B. Brazelton & M. W. Yogman (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 95-124). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infant strange situation behavior: Phenotypic resemblance to dissociative states. In L. Michelson & W. Ray (Eds.), Handbook of dissociation (pp. 107-137). New York: Plenum Press.

McLaughlin, J. (2000). The use of the dyadic affective-state relationship (ASR) in the treatment of the post-traumatic stress disordered adult molested as a child. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://www.traumatic -stress .org

Ogden, P., & Minton, K. (2000). Sensorimotor psychotherapy: One method for processing traumatic memory. Traumatology, 6(3), 1-28.

Quimette, P., Moos, R. H., & Finney, J. W. (2003). PTSD treatment and five-year remission among patients with substance use and post-traumatic stress disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 410-414.

Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: W. W. Norton.

Semple, W.E., Goyer, P., McCormick, R., Morris, E., Comptom, B., Berridge, M., Miraldi, F., & Shultz, S. C. (1992). Increased Orbital frontal cortex blood flow and hippocampal abnormality in PTSD: A pilot PET study. Biological Psychiatry, 31, 129A

Siegel, D. J. (2007). The mindful brain: Reflection and attunement in the cultivation of well-being. New York: W. W. Norton. van der Kolk, B. A. (2006). Clinical implications of neuroscience research in PTSD. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1071, 277-293.

van der Kolk, B. A., & Fisler, R. E. (1994). Childhood abuse and neglect and loss of self- regulation. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 58, 145-168.

van der Kolk, B. A., Pelcovitz, D., Roth, S., Mandel, F. S., McFarlane, A., & Herman, J. L. (1996). Dissociation, somatization, and affect deregulation: The complexity of adaptation to trauma. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 84-93.

Appendix
The following twelve steps, twelve traditions, and twelve concepts are listed below, which reflect the foundation of the twelve-step program.

I. The Twelve Steps
II. The Twelve Traditions (Short Form)
III. The Twelve Concepts (Short Form)

I. The Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous

1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol–that our lives had become unmanageable.
2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.
(Anonymous, 2001, pg. 59-60)

II. The Twelve Traditions (Short Form)

1. Our common welfare should come first, personal recovery depends upon A.A. unity.
2. For our group purpose there is but one ultimate authority–a loving God as He may express Himself in our group conscience. Our leaders are but trusted servants, they do not govern.
3. The only requirement for A.A. membership is a desire to stop drinking.
4. Each group should be autonomous except in matters affecting other groups or A.A. as a whole.
5. Each group has but one primary purpose–to carry its message to the alcoholic who still suffers.
6. An A.A. group ought never endorse, finance or lend the A.A. name to any facility or outside enterprise, lest problems of money, property and prestige divert us from our primary purpose.
7. Every A.A. group ought to be fully self-supporting, declining outside contributions.
8. Alcoholics Anonymous should remain forever nonprofessional, but our service boards or committees directly responsible to those they serve.
10. Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the A.A. name ought never be drawn into public controversy.
11. Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio and films.
12. Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all of our Traditions, ever reminding us to place principles before personalities.
(Anonymous, 2001, p. 562.)

III. The Twelve Concepts (Short Form)

I. Final responsibility and ultimate authority for A.A. world services should always reside in the collective conscience of our whole Fellowship.
II. The General Service Conference of A.A. has become, for nearly every practical purpose, the active voice and the effective conscience of our whole Society in its world affairs.
III. To insure effective leadership, we should endow each element of A.A.–The Conference, the General Service Board and its service corporations, staffs, committees, and executives–with a traditional “Right of Decision.”
IV. At all responsible levels, we ought to maintain a traditional “Right of Participation,” allowing a voting representation in reasonable proportion to the responsibility that each must discharge.
V. Throughout our structure, a traditional “Right of Appeal” ought to prevail, so that minority opinion will be heard and personal grievances receive careful consideration.
VI. The Conference recognizes that the chief initiative and active responsibility in most world service matters should be exercised by the trustee members of the Conference acting as the General Service Board.
VII. The Charter and Bylaws of the General Service Board are legal instruments, empowering the trustees to manage and conduct world service affairs. The Conference Charter is not a legal document; it relies upon tradition and the A.A. purse for final effectiveness.
VIII. The trustees are the principal planners and administrators of overall policy and finance. They have custodial oversight of the separately incorporated and constantly active services, exercising this through their ability to elect all the directors of these entities.
IX. Good service leadership at all levels is indispensable for our future functioning and safety. Primary world service leadership, once exercised by the founders, must necessarily be assumed by the trustees.
X. Every service responsibility should be matched by an equal service authority, with the scope of such authority well defined.
XI. The trustees should always have the best possible committees, cooperate service directors, executives, staffs, and consultants. Composition, qualifications, induction procedures, and rights and duties will always be matters of serious concern.
XII. The Conference shall observe the spirit of A.A. tradition, taking care that it never becomes the seat of perilous wealth or power, that sufficient operating funds and reserve be its prudent financial principle; that it place none of its members in a position of unqualified authority over others; that it reach all important decisions by discussion, vote, and whenever possible, by substantial unanimity; that its actions never be personally punitive nor an incitement to public controversy; that it never perform acts of government, and that, like the Society it serves, it will always remain democratic in thought and action.
(Anonymous, 2001, pgs. 574-575).